Member Login
Lost Password Lost User ID
Why Join
Become a Member
Renew Membership
Home STAO Store Virtual Library STAO Conference ScienceWorks Resources About STAO Contact Us

Resources - Archived Materials

SCHOOL ACHIEVEMENT INDICATORS PROGRAM (SAIP)
January - 1997

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The School Achievement Indicators Program (SAIP) was initiated by the Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (CMEC) to provide a mechanism for reporting on levels of achievement attained by 13- and 16-old students across Canada. Following are both national and Ontario highlights from the results of the 1996 assessment in science.

HIGHLIGHTS (CANADA):

  • There was a significant difference between the achievement of 13- and 16-year-old students in both the written and practical task components. More 16-year-olds than 13-year-olds attained level 3 or above. (Thirteen and 16-year-old students completed the same questions and tasks.)
  • Canadian girls of both age groups performed as well as boys in the practical component; on the written component, 13-year-old girls performed as well as boys, but 16-year-old boys performed slightly higher than girls.
  • In both the written and practical task components, fewer students than expected, of both age groups, achieved at the higher performance levels when actual results were compared with national expectations.
  • The results of most provinces/territories were not significantly different from each other. In the written component Alberta and Nova Scotia (French) students consistently demonstrated higher levels of performance than the results for Canada overall. Nova Scotia (French) students performed higher than Canada overall in the practical task component for 13 year-old students. No jurisdiction performed higher than Canada overall in the practical task component for 16 year-olds.
  • Approximately three-quarters of all 13- and 16-year-olds reported they like science.
  • A relatively large proportion of students reported that doing science experiments and being involved in team work contributed to their interest in science.
  • About 90% of all students reported they were confident in their science abilities.
  • Nearly 90% of all students agreed that hard work and study were key requirements for success in science.

HIGHLIGHTS (ONTARIO):

  • There was a significant difference between the achievement of 13- and 16-year-old students in both the written and practical task components. More 16-year-olds achieved at level 3 and above than did 13-year-olds.
  • In the written component, Ontario (English) 13- and 16-year-olds performed slightly less well than Canadian students as a whole.
  • In the practical task component, Ontario (English) 13- and 16-year-olds performed as well as Canadian students as a whole.
  • The achievement levels attained by the sizeable English-as-a-Second Language ( ESL) population were lower than the overall performance of Ontario 13- and 16-year-old, non-ESL students.
  • In both the written and practical task components, Ontario (French) 13- and 16-year-olds performed significantly lower than Canadian students as a whole.

BACKGROUND:

  • SAIP uses five performance levels and reports the percentage of students attaining knowledge and skills at each level. The five levels represent a continuum of science literacy acquired by students over the entire elementary and secondary school experience.
  • The SAIP results are reported for Canada as a whole and for individual provinces/territories. Due to the student sampling framework, it is not possible to provide reports at the school or school board levels.
  • The SAIP science assessment was developed by a consortium of provinces: Alberta, Saskatchewan, Ontario (French & English), and New Brunswick (French).
    The SAIP science assessment, administered in the spring of 1996, consisted of two main parts. One randomly selected sample of students completed a 2.5-hour written component made up of multiple-choice and short-answer questions. Another student sample completed a 2.5-hour practical task component in which students, using science materials, conducted experiments, recorded their observations, and solved science problems. A student questionnaire was also administered to all students who participated in the assessment.
  • All students writing this assessment started with a 12-question placement test with questions designed at level three. On the basis of their scores on those 12 questions, students doing the written assessment were given one of two booklets. Students who performed relatively well on the placement test were given the second booklet; those who performed less well were given the first booklet. Each booklet contained 66 questions. One booklet contained questions at levels 1, 2, and 3. The other booklet covered levels 3, 4, and 5. A combination of multiple-choice and short-answer questions were used. The same questions and tasks on the written and practical task components were completed by both 13- and 16-year-old students.
  • All provinces/territories contributed randomly selected samples of students to a national sample for both the written and practical task components of the assessment. Every province/territory over-sampled in the written component to derive provincial data. Four provinces: Saskatchewan, Ontario (English & French), New Brunswick (French), and Nova Scotia (English & French) over-sampled in the practical task component. All Nova Scotia (French) 13 and 16 year-old students were involved in the assessment.
  • A total of 7,676 students completed the assessments in Ontario.
  • National expectations were established for the SAIP science assessment, so that actual achievement results could be compared to expected results. To set these performance expectations, CMEC held three regional meetings with educators and non-educators in Western, Central, and Atlantic Canada. The resulting information helped CMEC interpret how well Canadian students performed on the assessment.

ONTARIO TRENDS - SAIP AND TIMSS (THIRD INTERNATIONAL MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE STUDY- 1995)

Both the 1995 TIMSS and the 1996 SAIP assessments included tests of achievement for 13 year-old students. Each assessment involved written and practical test components, however, the results of the TIMSS practical task component will not be available until the spring of 1997. Following are some brief trends that emerged from both assessments in the 13 year-old written category only:

  • Ontario Francophone and Anglophone students performed less well than Canada overall.
  • Ontario Francophone students performed less well than their Anglophone counterparts.
  • Alberta students performed significantly higher than the results for Canada overall.

FURTHER STUDY

Following the release of TIMSS in November 1996, Ontario's Education Quality and Accountability Office (EQAO) initiated a number of research activities to improve mathematics and science education in Ontario. It is expected that most of the research will be conducted by July 1997. Following are several areas currently under study:

Identifying curriculum content and teaching practices of high-scoring jurisdictions to determine what programs/practices should be considered by Ontario.

Investigating teacher education internationally and its relationship to student achievement.

Determining the link between curriculum and test results.

Establishing the relationships between student attitudes and achievement.

Establishing the relationship between parental involvement and achievement.

 

Google